http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/ No, not for you. Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:08:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-1689 Michael Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:28:43 +0000 http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/#comment-1689 I haven't personally tested this on either, but conceptually, there shouldn't be any issues. Perhaps the Accept header or the MIME types are being sent across differently? I'll give it a test when I get some free time. I haven’t personally tested this on either, but conceptually, there shouldn’t be any issues. Perhaps the Accept header or the MIME types are being sent across differently? I’ll give it a test when I get some free time.

]]> http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-1640 Erin Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:16:25 +0000 http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/#comment-1640 Have you ever had any issues with Safari or Chrome? I love the concept, but am running into issues with these browsers. Have you ever had any issues with Safari or Chrome? I love the concept, but am running into issues with these browsers.

]]> http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Andriy Mykhaylyuk Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:38:27 +0000 http://icanhascode.com/2009/05/simple-ror-respond_to-functionality-in-aspnet-mvc/#comment-201 Thanks for you post, exactly the solution which I was looking for. Thanks for you post, exactly the solution which I was looking for.

]]>